If you had to pick one, which would it be and why? Or something similar you think is better? I wanna hear. Thanks!
FappyEnding ( 151 )I just tried my first onahole with the la bocca and my world has been changed.
Are these hips that much of a difference compared to the hand held onaholes? I am already researching my 2nd onahole but not looking at something so expensive yet.
Are these hips that much of a difference compared to the hand held onaholes? I am already researching my 2nd onahole but not looking at something so expensive yet.
N7Commander ( 171 )From my experience, hip/torsos brings a more enhanced experience due to size and weight. Common drawbacks being fragility, cleaning, and in some cases, storage. I've owned the eph 3rd generation before (damage) and I have other larger toys (5lbs and up). Another obvious point is the price range. As you've noticed, they can get hella pricey and looking back, I could have gotten an actual doll! In short, you should try if you aren't lazy about cleaning, have storage space and agreement with your wallet.
Greenwood95 ( 565 )Having owned three hips in the past, I can say yes they are harder to clean than regular on-a-holes but not overly so. Yes a kitchen sink works but I tended to use the bathtub/removable shower head to rinse them off. For open/through hole it was easy to wash water and soap through to clean them out and washcloth or sham-wow them reasonably dry. For closed hole I used a turkey baster with a mister of soap/water to basically douche it out then rinse. Worked fine. A little more time required but worth it.
Greenwood95 ( 565 )Tough call. As an assman, I'm always eyeing up the hip toys but lots more factors to consider than a simple onahole.
Both are roughly the same size, and same price (only a $13 difference). As a guy who is always seeking true 1:1 scale on hips and usually finding the Japanese hips to always be a little small... like always 20-30% too small for a real woman's behind (maybe in Japan it's common to find such petite women?) it's always a mild let down. Main thing I look for: if the width is near or over 12 inches, then for 1:1 scale we're in business. For this and the overall sexiness rounds of the sculpt the Office Lady wins at being 11.88 inches wide.
BUT- sexy butt or not it has to feel good, be durable etc. The EPH 3rd Gen, has 17 mostly glowing reviews and I can tell looking at the internal tunnel design it's likely to feel better based on similar onaholes I have. It's mostly life-size a 10.63 inches but a good niche small in width to the Office Lady. Hard to say how the actual butt on the EPH 3rd gen looks though, no clear shot of it. Both have the 3d functional hip design so both are probably equally versatile in various positions. The Office Lady is a little shorter though, odd but not a deal breaker.
I owned the EPH Gen 1 from 2013. it was versatile, very soft and jiggly but it was single layer and internally not very stimulating to me. Fun, but it could never get me to reach orgasm which was a shame. Also it was still a tick too small to be truly 1:1 scale. (around 10" wide as I recall). I will say the current EPH looks to have improved interiors and been sized up a little.
As much as I want to veer to the size aesthetics of the Office Lady, I know all too well the disappointment of having a hip that doesn't fully satisfy my cock. Not to say Office Lady would disappoint for sure but for a 250 gamble, I'd probably veer to the general better looking tunnel and high reviews of the EPH 3rd Gen.
Both are roughly the same size, and same price (only a $13 difference). As a guy who is always seeking true 1:1 scale on hips and usually finding the Japanese hips to always be a little small... like always 20-30% too small for a real woman's behind (maybe in Japan it's common to find such petite women?) it's always a mild let down. Main thing I look for: if the width is near or over 12 inches, then for 1:1 scale we're in business. For this and the overall sexiness rounds of the sculpt the Office Lady wins at being 11.88 inches wide.
BUT- sexy butt or not it has to feel good, be durable etc. The EPH 3rd Gen, has 17 mostly glowing reviews and I can tell looking at the internal tunnel design it's likely to feel better based on similar onaholes I have. It's mostly life-size a 10.63 inches but a good niche small in width to the Office Lady. Hard to say how the actual butt on the EPH 3rd gen looks though, no clear shot of it. Both have the 3d functional hip design so both are probably equally versatile in various positions. The Office Lady is a little shorter though, odd but not a deal breaker.
I owned the EPH Gen 1 from 2013. it was versatile, very soft and jiggly but it was single layer and internally not very stimulating to me. Fun, but it could never get me to reach orgasm which was a shame. Also it was still a tick too small to be truly 1:1 scale. (around 10" wide as I recall). I will say the current EPH looks to have improved interiors and been sized up a little.
As much as I want to veer to the size aesthetics of the Office Lady, I know all too well the disappointment of having a hip that doesn't fully satisfy my cock. Not to say Office Lady would disappoint for sure but for a 250 gamble, I'd probably veer to the general better looking tunnel and high reviews of the EPH 3rd Gen.
Papi ( 203 )both of these looks so good but if I was buying something this big in the future i'd probably go with the that Extreme Pleasure Hip Third Generation, seems like the vagina lips looks less bulgy and the tunnel looks better. Theres no reviews of the office lady so dunno about that one.