So basically my size ain’t really something to be proud and I need recommendations that will work. Thank you.
Jonarby ( 592 )
@McPlay I find that the size of the onahole doesn't really matter, so long as it's roughly equal to or greater than the size of your manhood. The only real issues arrive when it's significantly smaller, and you're constantly pushing up against the end of the onahole.
I think for the best experience, you should go for something that is similar all throughout the hole. This way, you're not missing any major texture changes during use, and you avoid paying for such texture changes when you won't be experiencing them.
I'd try things like “Cow Girl” (Tunnel Length: 4.7inches (11.94 cm)) by ToysHeart or Virgin Loop Trinity (Tunnel Length: 5.12inches (13 cm)) by Ride Japan. These are both superb, premium and popular onaholes, with little to no texture variation that you'd be missing by having smaller proportions.
I think for the best experience, you should go for something that is similar all throughout the hole. This way, you're not missing any major texture changes during use, and you avoid paying for such texture changes when you won't be experiencing them.
I'd try things like “Cow Girl” (Tunnel Length: 4.7inches (11.94 cm)) by ToysHeart or Virgin Loop Trinity (Tunnel Length: 5.12inches (13 cm)) by Ride Japan. These are both superb, premium and popular onaholes, with little to no texture variation that you'd be missing by having smaller proportions.
Belmar ( 296 )
@Jonarby Neither of these suggestions are what he asked for. Trinity is a fat behemoth at 600 grams and has a wide entry, plus the actual tunnel begins quite a distance from the entry. IMO, by design, hitting the back of the Cowgirl is part of its overrated and overpriced charm.
Jonarby ( 592 )
@Belmar He never mentioned anything about girth, so the width of the tunnel was not my priority here, he just said 2-4 inch onaholes. Unfortunately, this makes it hard to give a more informed answer or recommendation. I also don't know if he is or is not circumcised, which could also help in finding him an onahole. Your criticism about Virgin Loop Trinity onahole is fair, I had totally forgotten that the actual texture of it does start quite a bit in. I never thought of one of the main points of Cow Girl as hitting the back of the hole personally.
I do like your personal recommendations to him, though. And if either one of us can help him, or if we can both assist in different ways, that's all that matters really.
I do like your personal recommendations to him, though. And if either one of us can help him, or if we can both assist in different ways, that's all that matters really.
Belmar ( 296 )
@McPlay On this website (or any other that I know of) you can't search by tunnel length or weight, nor is there a tagging system. (You can, however, search for "Material:Steel" or "# of holes:0") You will have to read product descriptions and reviews and experiment. And maintain a degree of skepticism, especially with advice. Here are some suggestions:
1) Flexible is better, allowing for stretch in both directions. A hard Onahole can lead to a hard stop and hand pressure is less effective..
2) Avoid cheap products with thin side walls, even if they look about right. They likely will not support the tunnel design. A wider tunnel with adequate support will provide better sensation.
3) Use the special order option for products that say "discontinued" and for products from Japanese websites.
4) You do not need to read Japanese. Most of the text in Japanese is dubious marketing. Cut and paste text or link to google translate.
5) Look for cutaway photos and videos. Ba Bu Mi Sticky Type is worth your consideration and is currently available on this site. Cutaway (and often a video) available here: e-nls.com/pict1-52033?c2=12001110
6) In addition to G project and Toysheart, Look at the brand name Mate: mzakka.com/pc/detail/category.php?category=1801&p1=&mt1=1976&st1=&genre=0&order=0&ref=0&pc=&iname=&inameonly=&orand=&pricel=&priceu=
1) Flexible is better, allowing for stretch in both directions. A hard Onahole can lead to a hard stop and hand pressure is less effective..
2) Avoid cheap products with thin side walls, even if they look about right. They likely will not support the tunnel design. A wider tunnel with adequate support will provide better sensation.
3) Use the special order option for products that say "discontinued" and for products from Japanese websites.
4) You do not need to read Japanese. Most of the text in Japanese is dubious marketing. Cut and paste text or link to google translate.
5) Look for cutaway photos and videos. Ba Bu Mi Sticky Type is worth your consideration and is currently available on this site. Cutaway (and often a video) available here: e-nls.com/pict1-52033?c2=12001110
6) In addition to G project and Toysheart, Look at the brand name Mate: mzakka.com/pc/detail/category.php?category=1801&p1=&mt1=1976&st1=&genre=0&order=0&ref=0&pc=&iname=&inameonly=&orand=&pricel=&priceu=
Drivinglinkauto ( 11 )
@McPlay have you checked raiman in the pre-order section? I think that’s perfect for your demand.
PickyDude ( 58 )
@McPlay The Muses Fillo by Tomax has a shorter tunnel, not sure of the actual length but it might work well for you. It's too short for me (I'm an average 6") and I don't use it much for that reason. Tomax makes great toys and I have three others (Muses Kokalo rich soft, Venus Real very soft, Venus Clone very soft - yes, I like softer toys) so if the tunnel length of the Fillo toy looks compatible, it's definitely worth a look. Only problem is that Tomax toys sell out quick and are often out of stock.
dudernet79 ( 4 )
@McPlay The Short Size HIDA is my favorite, though I've certainly not tried all.
I too seek out onaholes in this size range, to match my own (~4 inch) size. There's nothing worse (to me) than having some giant floppy toy hanging off the end of my little guy. The opposite of a turn-on.
Anyway, the short size is currently out of stock (though there is a "uterus" version, in the short size, in stock. I've tried both and the non-uterus is by far my favorite. I actually ordered several from Amazon Japan when they went out of stock here (though, Toydemon, I have my alert set and will be purchasing here again if/when they ever come back!).
In the meantime, may I recommend the Tenga spinners? They're a little basic, sure, but just about the perfect size ... and even though they're a smidge longer than I am, they're so lightweight, that they don't dangle or feel oversized.
And I would second the request for a pinned topic on this — or a staff-curated list of those onaholes best for us smaller guys. The filters can only do so much, and I would love to be doing something other than taking a short stab in the dark when guessing what might feel right.
I too seek out onaholes in this size range, to match my own (~4 inch) size. There's nothing worse (to me) than having some giant floppy toy hanging off the end of my little guy. The opposite of a turn-on.
Anyway, the short size is currently out of stock (though there is a "uterus" version, in the short size, in stock. I've tried both and the non-uterus is by far my favorite. I actually ordered several from Amazon Japan when they went out of stock here (though, Toydemon, I have my alert set and will be purchasing here again if/when they ever come back!).
In the meantime, may I recommend the Tenga spinners? They're a little basic, sure, but just about the perfect size ... and even though they're a smidge longer than I am, they're so lightweight, that they don't dangle or feel oversized.
And I would second the request for a pinned topic on this — or a staff-curated list of those onaholes best for us smaller guys. The filters can only do so much, and I would love to be doing something other than taking a short stab in the dark when guessing what might feel right.
Belmar ( 296 )
@**TD** It might be useful for sales and customer convenience to pin a topic similar to this one, as well as a separate topic for those too big for a standard ona. There is plenty of room on the right side of the page. The "Latest" section could be eliminated, it shows exactly what we can see at the top of this comment section anyway