wolfarus

Absolutely terrible, imo.

When a sextoy mimics real flesh, there needs to be a certain level of firmness in the design. It shouldn't be hard, but it should not be this soft, either. As a hand-held, it was slightly taxing to use, as super-soft nature of the material made the top 1/2 of the torso flop around a bit, forcing me to apply more effort in keeping the wobbling under control.

The sensation was equally disappointing. The design itself seems good, but again the over-soft nature of the material gave me very little stimulation. as the folds/ridges/ect of the design just offered no resistance, and felt like they were just being squashed into the inner-sides of the sleeve.

As for the outward appearance of the sleeve, nothing about it says "fairy". (As it shows in the description, but i thought i'd re-emphasize it). It isn't designed to look petite, as you would expect a fairy woman to be. It's just an average torso sleeve-with-tits design.

Wish TD let us use 1/2 star reviews, as i think this is a 2.5 star product. But given the issues i'm about to list, rated down rather then up to the 3rd star.

Biggest issue is the top-heavy nature of the doll. Given that she is solid material, it really needs a solid plastic insert acting as a spine. Without one, it just awkwardly flops around during positioning/use (unless you're just using her in missionary, on a solid surface)

Feet/legs/thighs are really soft and pliant, so you can use her feet for minor stimulation(if you're into that) and the legs/thighs can be spread out or pushed under her quite easily, if you want to attempt doggy.

Given the heavy-ish (for her size) weight of the doll, i wouldn't recommend trying to use her in cowgirl unless you have decent+ arm strength and stamina. As for the stimulation of the orifices, i think they are lackluster/basic. Not terrible, but by no means good (again, personal opinion)

Given the price-to-size, i def. think they could have put more into her design. Like the mentioned spine, colored aerola's, better orifice design, ect. As she stands now, i'm going to use her more as an erotic decoration then a sex toy.

Let's start with a very minor defect/inconsistency w/ whats shown in the product page. The page show's the toy's red area confined to the immediate area of the orifice itself. The one i got has the red area covering about 70% of the "face" of the sleeve, as well as going up onto the top a bit. Obviously the mismatch on coloring does not impact the physical performance of the sleeve, but it is diff from what's pictured to it had to be mentioned.

As stated in the title, this is -THE- tightest toy i've yet to experience. So tight, infact, that i can imagine that this toy gives the feeling of what an..illegal..partner might give you. You def. wont be getting into this successfully(or at the very least easily) if you are not 100% hard. The opening of this sleeve is barely the size of a pencil eraser. Yes, THAT small.

I have above average girth, and i was barely able to get into it. If you are thicker then that, then this toy might actually be uncomfortable for you to use. Same for length. Average to Average+ should be ok, anything longer and you'll be bottoming out before getting all the way in.

Found the stimuation once i was in pretty good, though for some reason i was feeling a bit more constriction/pressure on the top of my dick vs the other area's. Nothing unpleasant, just more of a focus of sensation in that area.

The size of the sleeve is great, not much thicker then a single-serve (20oz) soda bottle. So quite easy to use 1-handed, provided you have average+ hand size.

Cleaning was pretty easy, as far as i could tell. Used a douche/enema bulb to shoot warm+ water into it to rinse it out, repeat a cple times, then add some mild hand soap in, scrub around w/ a soft-bristled bottle brush and rinse another cple times. Baby-powdered the outside, used drying sticks on the inside and done.

Long story short: the stimulation was very lacking, at least for me. I'm above average in girth, average in length, so i dont think it was a problem of "fit".

The density of the material is very soft, so that may have played a role in lack of stimulation (real flesh, while soft, isnt THAT soft..there's a level of firmness to it that aides in helping men climax).

I was in a constant state of about 40% to climaxing( never enough stimulation from the machine to get me to and over the edge), and i had to resort to using it like you would any non-motorized hand-held to get myself to finishing.

Pity that i blew $250ish for something that didnt do anywhere near what i wanted, but that's life for ya. You win some, you loose some.

TD is awesome w/ their shipping as always, though. Ordered it on a 2-5 day shipping schedule, had it here on day 3.

I'm going to start out by saying most of my issues w/ this torso could be taken as purely personal, so they may not be a problem for others.

Her tits feel fantastic. Soft enough to squeeze and bounce when you're thrusting hard, but not so soft that they flop all over the place. And so far they hold their shape perfectly. I've had her on her stomach for doggy-style several times so far, and they come right back into their out-of-the-box shape immediately.

Torso itself feels solid, though the internal plastic (?) insert does come really close to the surface around her pelvis area, so it's quite noticeable if you have your hands around her hips.

I agree w/ MasterOnanist's point that the tunnel design's for the anal/vaginal orifices need to be switched. While i don't think the anal design is 100% matching to a real vagina, i consider it to be the closest to the real thing i've yet to experience w/a toros/toy/doll (i'd say it's a 80-90% match). Vaginal design is pleasurable enough, but the anal is better.

Now onto my critiques:

She should have been designed with a realistic looking vagina (labia, ect) instead of the basic "Undeveloped" camel-toe.

Her ass needs to be bigger, both for aesthetic purposes, and practical ones: Not near enough cheek material to ass-job or give a good bounce-back when you're using her from behind. And clothing you may want her to wear (especially anything thin and showy like panties or spandex/leggings) dosnt fit quite right, because there's not enough there to fill it out.

Her thighs are practically non-existent, just a pair of rounded nubs. If she had around 5-6" of thigh, that would help her wear lower-body clothing better, and aid the positioning for doggy-style, imo.

If she was priced $100 - $150 less, then for the $ you're paying she'd be perfect. But as she stands priced now, i felt the above critiques were warranted.

And something misc. to mention: The last image shown in the product description seems to be meant as a cardboard cutout/poster. It's designed to be easily detached from the rest of the product box, and there's a little hook-hole at the top where you can attach it to a wall or free-hanging from a string.