PlasticMan

This lube is pretty essential for low-stimulation holes intended for long sessions, including Tomax holes. The lube is perfect for feeling subtle designs of low-stim tunnels. So, if your budget allows it and if you do have low-stimulation holes, I feel like this should be pretty high on the list for one's collection.

Plus, since a little goes a long way for this lube, it lasts a pretty damn long time. I've been using mine for about three months now and the amount of lube I have in the bottle is about an inch below the top, so at this rate, I could easily see this lube lasting me a year at least.

If there are flaws to this lube, they are flaws that pretty much come with the territory of being a thin lube in the first place. Thicker lubes are more versatile since you can simply add water to them to make them thinner. Insomnia can sometimes drip out of holes that aren't very tight and cause a mess. It's not ideal for all onaholes.

But, like I said before, this is a lube for a specific purpose and for specific situations. It makes sense to me to get it.

Update: 03/06/2023

After having more experience with onaholes and lubes generally, I no longer feel like the Insomnia is worth the purchase.

The thing about water-based lubes generally is that they can be easily thinned out with water. I no longer use the Insomnia on my soft onaholes, but instead just use a watered-down Onatsuyu. The main problem with the Insomnia is that it dries out rather easily, so I may be in the middle of using an onahole where I can feel my Johnson unpleasantly "catch" on the inner textures of the onahole.

I still wouldn't say it's bad, it's just that there are some amazing, almost flawless lubes out there that can be bought instead.

It's certainly a tight hole, as expected from the many reviews saying so. But, there's a reason that the Lolinco's tightness is its main selling point-- it's because there's not much else to say about it. Sure, the material of the inner tunnel is admittedly nice. It's elastic enough that it's not difficult to enter the Lolinco, and it's able to stretch enough to accommodate one's self to an extent. In other words, the tightness of the hole isn't overwhelming. It's a snug hole.

But, if you asked me how the inner tunnel exactly felt like, I'd be hard-pressed to answer. The inner tunnel has definite folds and creases, but it's difficult to pinpoint the exact textures and sensations. And it's not an all-encompassing stimulation or an enveloping softness like some other holes. It all just feels sort of vaguely squishy, elastic, and bumpy.

Another point against the Lolinco is the build quality. The tunnel of the hole feels misaligned. When I enter the Lolinco, I can feel the large amount of material on the bottom of the toy, but I can just as much see myself stretching the very thin upper parts. It's difficult to pump too hard because of this because when I do that, I feel myself bumping against the roof of the tunnel instead of smoothly sliding in and out (the large meaty lips also make it annoying to fully pump in and out imo). Maybe this was just a fault of my hole specifically, but if so, then that's still a mark against the Lolinco for inconsistency of its build.

I'm not too keen on the Lolinco, but considering the price, I'd say it's worth it. I prefer it over some onaholes that are more expensive.

This is a clear example why I wait a few weeks before judging whether I like an onahole or not-- at first, I thought this was a boring onahole, but now I've come to realize the great pleasure this toy can bring.

The Venus Real's inner design is very straightforward. The tunnel itself has a curve in it to gently press against yourself and all the tunnel walls have small creases along them (and even if you run your finger along those creases, they can be hard to feel sometimes). And that's it. My favorite onaholes that I've tried so far all had complicated tunnel designs, like the Witch's Temptation or Fuwatoro, so when I tried out the Real for the first few times, I was very disappointed. I thought that the sensation was too gentle and not stimulating enough. But, like I've said before, my opinion has greatly shifted since then. Now why is that?

This is a definite hole meant for edging, or long and slow sessions. Because the Real's inner tunnel is so subtle throughout its length, you can pump pretty hard at it even at the very end of your sessions. Those subtle sensations end up growing into an electrifying pleasure along your entire Johnson by the end of it. With other onaholes I've tried, there were ridges, bumps, and folds that directly pleasured specific localizable points on your Johnson (like the underside or tip) as their selling point. Instead, the Real gives an all-encompassing, melting pleasure.

When I say all of that, I hope I'm not giving off the impression that the end of your sessions are the only good part and that the beginning portion is just something you have to work through to reach the good stuff. I don't mean that at all, and the reason for that is the best thing about the Real in my view: the material and the density. The Real's material is unlike other onaholes I've tried. It's meaty, supple, and soft. For example, in the middle of sessions, my Johnson can't usually feel my fingers pressing against the onahole when I'm squeezing it. I just feel a vague pressure against my Johnson, unlike some of the thinner onaholes I've tried, if you know what I mean. That feeling of disconnect the Real creates between my hand and my Johnson is a huge plus, and although it's not something as easily apparent as a stimulating tunnel, it makes a world of a difference.

Some miscellaneous but important sidenotes: the Real is best used with a thin lube, like Tomax's Insomnia. It allows one to feel all the subtle grooves and creases. The Real is also a go-to hole if you haven't masturbated in a decent while. And the Real has a fantastic build that is well-produced and evidently durable.

This was the first onahole I ever got, and I still think back on it fondly. There are other reviews on this page saying that they don't feel anything, and I have to say that I disagree. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. I think this has a strong balance between its highly varied tunnel design and very soft material. Looking at the pictures of the tunnel designs, there are nubs at the beginning to hug all sides of your member, a protrusion to press against your underside (this provided the most stimulation for me), followed by all sorts of folds and bumps. Now, it's no question that this design would be highly stimulating in a harder texture, which is where the mixed responses come in. Due to the soft material, the tunnel doesn't press against or squeeze your member like some other onahole would. There is instead a feeling of your member being enveloped and snugly teased. Because I know my own preferences and Johnson, it's evident to me that the highly intricate tunnel design alone, regardless of the softness of the material, will feel stimulating to me. Again, different strokes for different folks.

Other than the tunnel design, there are a few other things I like about this onahole. It's weighty, for one thing. It's fun to lie down, prop it on top of you, and bounce with it. Another thing I like is that, because the tunnel design is so intricate, it's fun to try out all sorts of angles with the onahole to mix things up a bit. Doggy style? Why not. Lie on your side and thrust into it? Sure, if I feel like doing that today. And one last important thing, the onahole is pretty durable, which is always a plus.

Just an all-around great onahole. It has good suction, it's very durable, and it's well-built. There's even a grip on the outside that makes for a nice, minor addition that I didn't know I wanted until I used it. But the greatest highlight is the inner tunnel, which is both varied and stimulating. The first chamber has ridges which press into the underside of your Johnson, and it's addicting